Developed for Global Nation, this new report surveys the Climate & Health ecosystem and presents ten case studies of interventions and strategies from around of the world, offering fresh ideas and highlighting projects worthy of replication.

For Global Nation, an article on the necessity for immediate international action to support Syria’s reconstruction, starting with lifting international sanctions.
“It’s a question we should not have to ask: Is the international community approaching Syria with the intent to support and enable a successful transition, or with the expectation – not to say a wager – on its failure?
After nearly 14 years of war, more than half a million dead, five million refugees and seven million internally displaced, the answer should be clear. The flurry of diplomatic attention towards Damascus since the fall of Bashar Al-Assad on December 8th should have been a promising sign. A stable Syria is squarely in the global interest, yet early indications have been disappointing…….”
OXCON is proud to contribute to the Lord Mayor Appeal Charity, which this year is organised under the title A Better City for All.
Based in the City of London, we fully support the endeavour to create a City that is Inclusive, Healthy, Skilled & Fair. In addition this year’s campaign is emphasising Mental Health Awareness – a cause that we support fully.
You can follow updates and news from this year’s campaign here.
We were delighted to take part in the MIT Arab Alumni Annual Conference, on a panel entitled “Inequality and Social Justice in the time of Corona”.
Leave your comments and questions below!
We have excellent content for you this week!
We were happy to ‘sit’ with the Talking Africa podcast for a conversation about the economic situation in North Africa, the COVID-19 response of regional countries, debt relief on the continent, among other topics.
Please listen and share your comments!
ALSO please check this CNBC op-ed, “Africa needs to work together, with all sectors of society to deal with COVID-19” penned by the Africa Unusual Working Group, which we cofounded.
IN ADDITION, view the recorded conversation we led over at Chatham House, with David Butter, about his latest policy brief on Egypt and the Gulf: Allies and Rivals.
Paper Launch – Egypt and the Gulf: Allies and Rivals🌐 Paper Launch – Egypt and the Gulf: Allies and Rivals📅 Thursday 23 April 2020⏰ 13:00 – 14:00 BSTEgypt and the Gulf Arab region have long been important poles of political, military, economic and cultural power and influence in the Middle East. A recently published Chatham House paper, examines the strategic and economic relationship between Egypt and the Gulf focusing in particular on the period since Abdel-Fattah el-Sisi came to power in Egypt. Author David Butter offers a detailed evaluation of these economic relationships, in the broader context of a strategic alliance that, since 2013, has been informed by a common commitment between Egypt and the UAE in particular to keep in check the Muslim Brotherhood and its regional state supporters, primarily Turkey and Qatar.In this webinar, the author will discuss the paper’s main argument, namely, that the degree of Egypt’s dependence on Gulf countries has fluctuated, and that by 2019, Egypt’s direct financial dependence on the Gulf was significantly reduced by comparison with the initial three years of the Sisi era, although other economic linkages such as investment, trade, remittances and tourism remained strong, with potential for growth. The speaker will also discuss the impact of the global crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic on Egypt’s and Gulf countries’ economies and will explore the implications for the relationship between Egypt and the Gulf.Speaker: David Butter, Associate Fellow, Middle East and North Africa Programme, Chatham HouseModerator: Mohamed El Dahshan, Associate Fellow, Middle East and North Africa Programme, Chatham House
Posted by Chatham House Middle East and North Africa Programme on Thursday, April 23, 2020
VERSION FRANCAISE SUIT – النسخة العربية تلي الإنجليزية
for any additional information, please reach out: contact@oxcon.co
RELEASE –
In light of the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, OXCON has joined forces with other organisations and thought leaders from across the continent to develop a briefing paper outlining priority interventions for African governments.
The brief, which is available for download in English, French and Arabic, focuses on four main themes:
The report also highlights a number of international best practices, many of them in Africa, that could serve as a starting point for governments across the continents.
النسخة العربية
في ضوء أزمة فيروس كورونا، انضمت أوكسكون إلى مجموعة من المنظمات وقادة الفكر من جميع أنحاء القارة لتطوير ورقة موجزة تحدد أولويات العمل للحكومات الأفريقية.
و تركز هذة الورقة البحثية، و هي متاحة باللغات الإنجليزية والفرنسية والعربية ، على أربعة محاور رئيسية:
كما يسلط البحث الضوء على عدد من الممارسات الدولية المتميزة، والعديد منها في أفريقيا، والتي يمكن أن تمثل نقطة انطلاق للحكومات في تخطيطها لمواجهة الأزمة.
Version française
À la lumière de la crise COVID-19, OXCON s’est associé à d’autres organisations et leaders d’opinion pour élaborer une note d’information, décrivant les interventions prioritaires pour les gouvernements africains.
Ce document, disponible en anglais, français et arabe, se concentre sur quatre domaines d’intervention:
Le rapport met également en évidence des meilleures pratiques internationales, dont plusieurs en Afrique, qui pourraient servir de point de départ pour les gouvernements du continent africain.
[Originally published in African Business Magazine.]
How can fragile and conflict-affected countries in Africa embrace the benefits of the fourth industrial revolution and avoid its downsides? Mohamed El Dahshan considers two cardinal rules that policymakers should be sure to follow.
————————————————–
Forget humanoid robots and gene editing for a second.
In many corners of the world, the promise held by the fourth industrial revolution (4IR) feels remote, ethereal; and nowhere is this truer than in fragile and conflict-affected states (FCAS). Not because the 4IR does not hold much promise for them; but because other priorities, such as peace-building and stabilisation, appear fundamentally more urgent and, erroneously, at odds with it. There is thus a pressing need to consider its impact, identifying how the 4IR can best serve fragile states, and likewise how to best address challenges in ways that would further their stability and support their country-specific priorities.
Yet existing research of the 4IR focuses largely on developed nations; when it tackles developing countries, research focuses on middle and upper-middle income nations. Fragile states, each with their unique mix of economic, security, and stability challenges, appear to be largely excluded from this analysis, either due to lack of data, or failure to understand the challenges that these countries face. Which makes analysing them even more crucial.
Fragility – including political, economic, environmental, security and societal fragility – is an African problem. The Fragile States Index lists 39 African countries among the planet’s 59 most fragile. For the World Bank, 19 out of 36 “fragile situations” are African.
Yet some of the risks and opportunities of the 4IR, listed by Klaus Schwab in his 2018 tome, Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, will sound eerily familiar to policymakers in fragile contexts. These include, among others, the risk of exacerbating income and wealth inequality within countries; the need for fresh approaches and social protection systems to cope with labour market disruptions; (re)designing skills development and employment models to boost labour productivity and creativity; ensuring the 4IR does not harm society’s vulnerable groups, including women and minority communities and cultures; and ensuring individual freedoms are maintained through these cataclysmic changes.
It is thus entirely possible to consider policies that would allow those countries to take advantage of this global developmental movement – beyond the obvious benefits of better telecommunications infrastructure or more affordable access to technology.
There, are already bright spots, of course, and sectors where fragile nations have proven adept at adopting, implementing, and deploying cutting edge technologies; Rwanda’s use of drones for medical deliveries to rural hospitals and – perhaps more interestingly for our purposes here – the accompanying regulatory framework, come to mind.
But even when we laud local 4IR success stories, we need to understand how underlying fragility could affect the often fragile equilibrium of FCAS. Somalia, for instance, has one of the most dynamic mobile money ecosystems, with 155m transactions taking place every month. But the sector is precariously poorly regulated, owing to weak state capacity. Largely untaxed, it represents a missed revenue opportunity for the state.
Take automation, for instance – one of the most salient trends of today and tomorrow. Though promising productivity gains globally, developing countries with young populations will necessitate “additional productivity raising measures […] to sustain their economic development”, according to a McKinsey flagship report on automation.
Countries will no longer be able to rely on their low wages to be competitive or attract investment. But low-income countries, particularly those that have emerged from crises, specifically look upon such jobs as a means to (re)build a middle class, engine of growth and consumption. This will require specific interventions, mass-scale re-skilling programmes, and social policies to ensure no one is left behind.
On the other hand, some technologies seem to offer particularly well-suited solutions for fragile contexts. Suffering from a deficit of trust, they could benefit from the use of distributed ledgers (such as blockchain) to assist in tasks such as land titling. Kenya has already begun to implement this; other countries are likely to follow. Likewise, public ledgers are being used to track value chains, identifying the source of components and ensuring quality and origin; Ethiopia has recently begun to do that for its coffee bean production.
Concerns will remain, and we need to be collectively cognisant of new challenges that emerge. Rumours and misinformation, spreading like wildfire through messaging apps in the hands of not-yet-discerning users, can undermine elections and contribute to communitarian violence. Some countries have adopted “false news” laws but there is the risk these could be use to suppress freedom of speech and jail critics.
So how can policymakers in FCAS prepare for the 4IR? By observing a cardinal rule of policy in fragile contexts: developing the twin goals of readiness and resilience. For this, decision makers will need to acknowledge that changes are numerous, fast, and overwhelming. There will be little room for slow policymaking that fails to appreciate that technology will impact every field of life. To succeed, they will need to partner with other stakeholders and will need to display transparency, openness, and collaboration with their populations. And they will need to acknowledge that they do not have all the answers.
There is no room for shying away from embracing the fourth industrial revolution. But there is certainly potential to mould its components to meet the needs of our countries, escaping from fragility and onto a sustainable development path. Some of the toughest challenges, however, may not be what we expect. As former Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf commented on her 12 years in power, the places where she may have failed were “in dealing with the softer issues: values, attitudes, norms”. And these challenges will only be exacerbated by technology, especially for nations seeking to catch up.
OXCON is happy to present our latest policy paper, on economic cooperation in North Africa, co-authored with the Moroccan Institute for Policy Analysis, which builds on a series of roundtables organised by Chatham House across the region over the past 14 months. We hope this kickstart fresh discussions on the possibilities, and limitations, of the discourse on ‘regional integration’: perhaps it’s better refocused as a search for synergies, building blocks towards improved cooperation, rather than setting ‘integration’ as an unattainable goal.
You can read it online, or download a printable version in English and in Arabic. Happy reading!
Discussions of North African integration have evoked ideas of a shared identity and a common destiny in the region. However, recent attempts to build regional blocs in North Africa have been unsuccessful. This paper examines the benefits of a ‘synergistic’ approach to North African cooperation.
Summary
OXCON is glad to partner once again with the Africa Impact Investing Leaders Forum. This year, we had the opportunity to address the audience of the AIILF on such topics as investment in LDCs and fragile countries, the role of DFIs, the potential of creating national and regional Guarantee funds, and how to utilise existing investment structures to achieve the SDGs.
The year got to a raging start and we’ve had scant time to update you on our public engagements!
But we’ve been immensely fortunate to interact with a wide range of partners and clients, and address very diverse audiences around the world over the past few months.
To give you the highlights,
In March, we addressed the OXFAM West Africa regional workshop on “Youth Employment in Value Chains in West Africa” in Niamey, Niger; introducing participants to the concept and implementation of value chains, notably at the bottom of the pyramid.
We spoke at the University of Oxford’s Africa Business Forum. Organised under the topic of “Single Market, Global Outcomes”, we spoke at a panel titled “Rebooting the sleeping giant: The fundamental infrastructure, energy and policies needed to support integrated trade across Africa”.
OXCON also contributed to the Commonwealth Africa Summit 2019. Under the theme “Investing in our Common Future”, we contributed to two different panels – “Doing Business in Africa: Managing the Corruption Factor” (alongside Peter Eigen, a personal hero of ours), as well as on “Fostering innovation in Commonwealth Africa to meet the continent’s unique challenges”.
In January for instance, we were graciously invited to attend, and address the Raisina Dialogue, India’s premier public policy conference. The panel, on the progress of gender equality on year after the ‘#MeToo’ movement, benefited from a number of perspectives from around the world.
The end of last year was also quite busy from a public engagement perspective. In December we got to enjoy the sun (but not the fog) of Morocco, where we addressed the audience of the Atlantic Dialogues in Marrakech, on “Fighting Corruption: Can Civil Society Lead the Way?”; as well as join a Chatham House expert round-table in Rabat, on “New models for transformation and cooperation for North African Cooperation and Competitiveness”; a few days before that, we joined the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA)’s Annual Democracy Forum in Windhoek, Namibia, addressing the audience on “Technology and Inclusion in Democratic Processes”.